
|
| wild_cleveland |
|
|||
|
thats what i am doing but i still have my xt and hq to work on aswell
_________________ If it has wheels or a skirt, You can't afford it. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| skidder |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: thanks krisisdog thats the answers im looking for, yes or no, now thats your opinion anyone else? As is said many times, opinions are like a***hole, everyone has one. Nothing to do with engines is "yes or no" (within reason of c o a r s e); everything is to do with trade offs. To those who say 190rwkw is unachievable, your f**k kidding; the reason it isn't done is because reliability and cost for most makes it not viable: you end up with an engine that would be a pig to drive on the street, very expensive and then leaving you questioning whether after spending all that money if you take it to the track do you really want to be revving it to the levels which are required to match the setup? (ie read into it more, if you don't rev it to these levels you will be getting beaten by cars with 'less power' being driven within the rev range they are designed to). In other words, if you are specifically after 190rwkw for the amount spent there are better options (ie any f/i whether chemical or physical).
_________________ {USERNAME} wrote: Cramping in the hand from having it on your Wang for an excessive period of time is a definate con. Seriously do people google "f**k up modifications for Fords owned by Jews" and get linked straight to this site nowadays? AU,factory fitted tickford kit/IRS, t5,Sports ryder/KYB: gone. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Crocket |
|
||
|
Will hopper heads out flow a tickford head by much?
|
||
| Top | |
||
| skidder |
|
|||
|
That's a very expansive question. I'm sure any aftermarket head will outflow the tickford one (it will probably perform better too).
But in saying this don't just assume because a head has more flow it will be a better choice.
_________________ {USERNAME} wrote: Cramping in the hand from having it on your Wang for an excessive period of time is a definate con. Seriously do people google "f**k up modifications for Fords owned by Jews" and get linked straight to this site nowadays? AU,factory fitted tickford kit/IRS, t5,Sports ryder/KYB: gone. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| pissed'N'broke |
|
|||
Age: 40 Posts: 251 Joined: 9th Sep 2009 Ride: ED falcon gli - XR6 replica Location: Canberra |
does anyone ever get stock cranks and rods balanced? or flywheels lightened? i had it done on my VW engine and it made a huge difference in the behavior of the engine at high rpms. is there any counter balanced 4L cranks available? if its gotta revv, this is where i would be looking after a decent head and valvetrain. my 2 cents
_________________ Ford ED Falcon Gli, T5 conv, Twinlight lights, exedy sports tuff clutch, modified EA front grill, ED XR6 complete interior, 19" speedy graphites, monroe gt shocks, kingspring superlows, CAI, ported tickford head, 3:45 LSD. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| misk_one |
|
|||
|
if you rebuilt an engine and you didnt balance it, your a fkwit lol.
it would want to make a difference from what i know all falcon cranks EF onwards are counter weighted for better balance, but could probly do a better job
_________________ {DESCRIPTION} |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| shnoza |
|
|||
|
As previously mentioned, 190rwkw is possible. If I remember correctly there was a guy who had 190rwkw but it was a track car.
Two reasons why people do not try to achieve this figure: 1. Not bang for buck- Just turbo or supercharge the car for same amount of money and get more power. 2. It is not recommended for street use as power will be in high rev range.
_________________ "Chuck Norris does not sleep. He waits."
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |