|
| TWiZTiD_EA |
|
|||
|
ok finally put my xr cam in today and in this car it didnt really give me the jump in kw's like it did when it was in the auto car
so i have checked cam timing and thats fine it does go better but not by that much
_________________ I really shouldn't f**k with people |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
the cams not that much different. you would only gain a handful of kw out of it
|
||
| Top | |
||
| concorde |
|
|||
|
get the tickford head, larger valves helps alot.
_________________ 2nd Place Summernats19 SQ Comp, Street Pro 0-600 Class
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| jonbays |
|
||
|
even with the head 164kw vs 157kw there not that much of a difference.
Its a nice little mod but but XR6 cam without XR6 head and ecu won't do much really |
||
| Top | |
||
| data_mine |
|
|||
|
the good part of teh XR package (not just the cam) is much more torque than a stocky. And it's torque that's fun.
_________________ 1998 DL LTD in Sparkling Burgundy, daily, 302W, stereo, slow |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| TWiZTiD_EA |
|
|||
|
the i noticed the torque more when the cam was in my old ea which was auto maybe because this car has the 5 speed i dont notice it as much but its only a fill in cam untill the new head has been finshed porting then a wade 1004 @ 10 deg will be going in.
I didnt think there was much differnt between the 5 speed ecu's i know mine doesnt have a rev limiter
_________________ I really shouldn't f**k with people |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| haggis |
|
|||
|
I went from a standard EL head to a tickford EF head, and the biggest difference was easily the extra midrange power. Also a little more down low, and the car doesn't seem to 'choke' as bad up high.
Summary: i found my gains to be in the midrange (2,000-4,000rpm)
_________________ I can see through wooden doors. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 67 guests |
