|
| sickd |
|
|||
|
USELESS wrote: Sick dont get me involved in the argument mate.I think BMWS are ugly.But that thing does beat the ba xr8's 0-100 without any problem.It is a bmw 330 ci coupe as a matter of fact.The engine technology in that I have not even seen in my dreams!! Ford might do it in 10 years if we are lucky.
im agreeing wiith you i think what you say is right 
_________________ BA XR8 BOSS 260
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| USELESS |
|
||
|
Education to clear up a few things
http://vettenet.org/torquehp.html
_________________ 14.77 @92.71mph July 06 14.52@95.68mph July 07 14.241 96.7 MPH in a shoebox/taxi au ford wagon!!Bwahahah still cant believe it!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| sickd |
|
|||
|
South wrote: Timmeh wrote: I will never understand the difference between torque and power. Doesnt matter how many different ways you care to explain I just dont get it. I guess thats why Isaac Newton is classed as a smart f**k. Torque = the amount of effort it takes to have a wank Power = the end result after all that stroking* *Stroking in this case = rpm Cop That  hahaha thats an excellent example HAHAHA im nilly wetting my pants hahaha (im not taking the piss out of you ) its really hard to tell if people are bull s**t or not but thats funny
_________________ BA XR8 BOSS 260
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| USELESS |
|
||
|
Education to clear up a few things
http://vettenet.org/torquehp.html
_________________ 14.77 @92.71mph July 06 14.52@95.68mph July 07 14.241 96.7 MPH in a shoebox/taxi au ford wagon!!Bwahahah still cant believe it!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| South |
|
|||
|
tickford_6: Your arguing my point... dont confuse yourself... The equation relates to a 1:1 driveline ratio with 0% loss.
Throw into the equation weight and gearing then its a completely different storey.
_________________ Fulli Sik Re |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| sickd |
|
|||
|
so i proves the original point does not matter if peak power or torque occurs its were it is most usefull in the rev range and it also proves that yobbos car in fact does not have a low mph compared to a "TRUE 148 KW " motor is that yobbo must launch later and pick up the time later down the strip where TRUE 148 kw car lacks its power, WELL done yobbo i want one of these cams
_________________ BA XR8 BOSS 260
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| South |
|
|||
|
Example...
*Both vehicles weigh the same, both driven by the same person, and both have the same gear ratios, torque and power figures are rear wheel, both engines are 100% efficient* Car A: I6 producing 500hp at 5000rpm, redline 7000rpm Car B: V8 producing 500hp at 5000rpm, redline 5500rpm which car crosses the quarter mile first, and why?
_________________ Fulli Sik Re |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
South wrote: Example...
*Both vehicles weigh the same, both driven by the same person, and both have the same gear ratios, torque and power figures are rear wheel, both engines are 100% efficient* Car A: I6 producing 500hp at 5000rpm, redline 7000rpm Car B: V8 producing 500hp at 5000rpm, redline 5500rpm which car crosses the quarter mile first, and why? you dont give enough info where is peak torque produce. are both autos with the same converter stall speed. what is the power curve for both eninges. how fast does the power drop off. what shift points are used in both car and one final and big problem is that if both engines are 100% efficient they wont both make 500hp at 5000rpm because they are different sizes |
||
| Top | |
||
| South |
|
|||
|
Finally, the answer has been provided...
Thankyou for participating 
_________________ Fulli Sik Re |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| USELESS |
|
||
|
Both at the same time.Because peak power and torque are the same.The redline is irrelevent because of these facts.
_________________ 14.77 @92.71mph July 06 14.52@95.68mph July 07 14.241 96.7 MPH in a shoebox/taxi au ford wagon!!Bwahahah still cant believe it!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| USELESS |
|
||
|
South wrote: Finally, the answer has been provided...
Thankyou for participating You are wrong.
_________________ 14.77 @92.71mph July 06 14.52@95.68mph July 07 14.241 96.7 MPH in a shoebox/taxi au ford wagon!!Bwahahah still cant believe it!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| USELESS |
|
||
|
2 identical cars with the same everything and one is v8 and one is a six will cross the line at the same time.We are talkng power and torque
_________________ 14.77 @92.71mph July 06 14.52@95.68mph July 07 14.241 96.7 MPH in a shoebox/taxi au ford wagon!!Bwahahah still cant believe it!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| stockstandard |
|
|||
|
useless has it right, but assuming that redline is somewhat of an indication of how much further the I6 and v8 could rev for while still making useful torque then the i6 will win.
_________________ Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| stockstandard |
|
|||
|
BTW: if someone does manage to prove me wrong then I want my HECS fees back!!!
_________________ Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| South |
|
|||
|
No there not, Ive given figures saying that each one at the same rpm produces the same HP, whos to say that the I6 doesnt go on to make another 200hp whilst the V8 is going to drop off to 400hp at redline?
HP is a mathematical calculation... It is meaningless... The engine capacity, its torque curve, the engines efficiency, the ratios, the convertor, the weight etc etc... It all plays a role on the street...
_________________ Fulli Sik Re |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests |
