|
| animal_ef |
|
||
|
which is a better intake piping,
the twin setup from an ef or the single from the el???? i tried searching many times but didnt find anything, thanks in advance!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| XH5LWEPN |
|
|||
|
im pretty sure the EL style is a bit better. Its a bit shorter and looks less restricting. Also all the aftermarket mandrel bent intakes are more like the EL shape rather than the EF. I dont think there will be much of a noticeable difference between the two.
_________________ STREETBUILT RACING |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Disco Frank |
|
|||
|
the EL is much much better
or get an au setup 
_________________ RIP SCOTT |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| EFXRWGN |
|
|||||
|
Been trying to find out if the BA one will fit the EF/EL anyone know if it will?
_________________
|
|||||
| Top | |
|||||
| Mr Man |
|
|||
|
EFXRWGN wrote: Been trying to find out if the BA one will fit the EF/EL anyone know if it will?
i may be wrong but doenst Hyena have the BA one of his EF??? animal_ef: the EF twin intake is good for 150rwkw... cheers.
_________________ 300+rwkw HeadsexTuned XR6 Turbo Ute *NOW SOLD |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| EFXRWGN |
|
|||||
|
Right you are. Thats the way I'm going!
_________________
|
|||||
| Top | |
|||||
| Spork |
|
|||
|
I have the BA one too. Just fits right on with the addition of a little PVC.
_________________ Manual EL Gli.
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| animal_ef |
|
||
|
Mr Man wrote: EFXRWGN wrote: Been trying to find out if the BA one will fit the EF/EL anyone know if it will? i may be wrong but doenst Hyena have the BA one of his EF??? animal_ef: the EF twin intake is good for 150rwkw... cheers. so if i want more than 150rwkw i would be better of with the el intake? |
||
| Top | |
||
| hornet |
|
|||
|
I thought I remember reading that the EF setup actually had less restriction than the EL one.
_________________ 5 Speed EL Futura
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| downingj |
|
||
|
Looking at the design of them, I would have thought that the EF's would give a touch better tourque and the EL, a touch less tourque, but a touch more power. Either way, it would be sweet F**k all difference between the two. I'd be surprised if it was even a single killerwatt of difference and be very very surprised if someone could actually tell the difference between the two.
FYI: JMM reckons that the EF style intake is the better bet... Besides, I reckon the EF set-up looks better
|
||
| Top | |
||
| estgonXR6 |
|
|||
|
So does anybody know if there is much benefit in using a BA intake pipe in a EF....??? or would it be better just to get a 3inch mandrel bent pipe made up...?
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| EFXRWGN |
|
|||
|
estgonXR6 wrote: So does anybody know if there is much benefit in using a BA intake pipe in a EF....??? or would it be better just to get a 3inch mandrel bent pipe made up...?
Im going the BA set up A: Mandrel bent piping around $400. B: BA setup about same KW increase for around $300 less.
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| MYLO_XR6 |
|
||
|
i think the mandrel bent setup would be better than a BA intake...looking at my intake on the ba, its not 100%straight, and flow would not be flowing as evenly/freely, a straighter custom pipe would be the way to go...
_________________
|
||
| Top | |
||
| estgonXR6 |
|
|||
|
hmmm so how much difference are we really talking about...??? besides the costs, are we talking about smoother excelaration, more KW or better torque... At least this way I know i I should get a aftermarket pipe or just the BA...?
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Sierra |
|
|||
|
downingj wrote: Looking at the design of them, I would have thought that the EF's would give a touch better tourque and the EL, a touch less tourque, but a touch more power. Either way, it would be sweet F**k all difference between the two. I'd be surprised if it was even a single killerwatt of difference and be very very surprised if someone could actually tell the difference between the two.
FYI: JMM reckons that the EF style intake is the better bet... Besides, I reckon the EF set-up looks better I would say the same. The EF has a large radius curve leading into the plenum, (no sharp bends) the twin small diameter intakes would help to increase airspeed through the inlet tract, in theory a nice setup that should work well. And at the risk of upsetting EL owners ... 
The EL intake looks like a cost cutting exercise in comparison with just a short rubber pipe with sharp 90 deg bends leading into the plenum .... not as good for airflow I would imagine. The EF setup looks like it would be a fair bit more expensive to manufacture too. This is all in theory but in the "real world" there may be very little between the two setups as has already been mentioned. Be an interesting excercise if someone had a chance to compare the two inlets on a dyno at the same time .... and also do a comparison without any inlet plumbing at all.
_________________ 95 EF XR6 Manual |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests |
*
