 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mr_sperm1
Cruise Moderator
Age:22
Posts: 2540
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Location: Hobart TAS, Australia
View User Gallery (13)
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:05 pm Post subject: Bit of a wtf dyno reading? |
 |
|
Dyno reading from my EF - 5 speed, K&N filter, AU snorkel, Pacemaker extractors, full 2.5" Lukey exhaust.
I know it runs rich, but 100kw? I was thinking it would pull more than that... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alfy
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:19
Posts: 4240
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Location: Port Lincoln SA, Australia
View User Gallery (5)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
max torque= 769.6NM... wtf?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpuDTE
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:23
Posts: 967
Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Location: Brisvegas QLD, Australia
View User Gallery (7)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Am I reading that right? 769 Nm of torque?
If so then something is wrong somewhere?... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpuDTE
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:23
Posts: 967
Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Location: Brisvegas QLD, Australia
View User Gallery (7)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lol, dam you alfy...beat me by what...30 secs! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mr_sperm1
Cruise Moderator
Age:22
Posts: 2540
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Location: Hobart TAS, Australia
View User Gallery (13)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't get me wrong - this thing still pulls and is far from being a slug!
When I saw that reading and talked about results from the mainland with similar mods, his only reply was that the dyno's must be tuned differently.
That's where the wtf factor comes in  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smiley235
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:22
Posts: 4787
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Location: melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (1)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thats more torque than a typhoon, and less power than a BA xt, something strange there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mr_sperm1
Cruise Moderator
Age:22
Posts: 2540
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Location: Hobart TAS, Australia
View User Gallery (13)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Timmeh wrote: | | What gear was it in? |
Was run in 4th (1:1 ratio) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
phongus
Fordmods Junkie
Age:23
Posts: 8811
Joined: 17 May 2005
Location: Melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (11)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think dyno needs calibration...that's a whole lot of torque 
phong =P~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redford
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:40
Posts: 556
Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Location: Brisbane QLD, Australia
View User Gallery (4)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| what diff ratio? that kind of torque is usualy rated with 1000hp engines, lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BigCav
Fordmods Parts Gopher
Age:22
Posts: 51
Joined: 12 Nov 2004
Location: broadford VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
haha u guys dont realise that torque figures like that dont work straight off a dyno, the only accurate way to measure torque is knowing the tractive effort equation and working backwards knowing all your ratio's etc
the torque shown there hasnt yet been divided by the diff ratio's etc, if its a 3:45 diff at a guess your looking at low 200nm at your rear wheels.
in my 250xflow i ran 250rwnm and 80rwkw, so mine made more torque meaning it was a more powerful motor down low however being an ohc u were able to pull further then my xflow could and were able to squeez 20 extra rwkw out of it thanks to the 1500 rpm mroe u have between our peak power points
do u understand the torque to power relationship?
p.s i think your motive force is wha ti know as tractive effort |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steady ED
Fordmods Addict
Age:22
Posts: 7001
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (13)
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't happen to know what other cars pull on that dyno would you?
A relative known, something like a stock XR6T?
Either way, I wouldn't stress, chassis dynos are tuning tools, nothing else.
It's pretty much impossible to compare one dyno reading to another.
I propose that if anyone wants to compare dyno readings, they all have to have power runs on a DD in shootout, a DD in non-shootout, the JMM dyno, a mainline dyno, and the Summernats DD HP hero dyno, then an average taken from all these figures
As for rich, 10.5-11:1 AFRs are about normal for a falcon at WOT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mr_sperm1
Cruise Moderator
Age:22
Posts: 2540
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Location: Hobart TAS, Australia
View User Gallery (13)
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BigCav wrote: | haha u guys dont realise that torque figures like that dont work straight off a dyno, the only accurate way to measure torque is knowing the tractive effort equation and working backwards knowing all your ratio's etc
the torque shown there hasnt yet been divided by the diff ratio's etc, if its a 3:45 diff at a guess your looking at low 200nm at your rear wheels.
in my 250xflow i ran 250rwnm and 80rwkw, so mine made more torque meaning it was a more powerful motor down low however being an ohc u were able to pull further then my xflow could and were able to squeez 20 extra rwkw out of it thanks to the 1500 rpm mroe u have between our peak power points
do u understand the torque to power relationship?
p.s i think your motive force is wha ti know as tractive effort |
That's the info I was after!
Am running the stock 3.23 gears, therefore the 769.6NM/3.23 would give me ~238NM
| Steady ED wrote: | Wouldn't happen to know what other cars pull on that dyno would you?
A relative known, something like a stock XR6T?
Either way, I wouldn't stress, chassis dynos are tuning tools, nothing else.
It's pretty much impossible to compare one dyno reading to another.
I propose that if anyone wants to compare dyno readings, they all have to have power runs on a DD in shootout, a DD in non-shootout, the JMM dyno, a mainline dyno, and the Summernats DD HP hero dyno, then an average taken from all these figures
As for rich, 10.5-11:1 AFRs are about normal for a falcon at WOT. |
No idea what other pull - he's more of a Holden dude 
I'm far from stressing on the figures, as I have seen on here the varaince in dyno readings.
Once Howell's are up and running with their dyno (should be early this year, could already be done!), I'll be heading there as I know these guys won't BS  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| (c)2002-2008 Matti Jones and Brad Evans |
[40 queries :: 0.06068 seconds ]
|
|
