Return To Fordmods Home Page
 Home |  Forums |  Search |  My Profile |  Chat
 Photo Gallery |  Events Calendar |  Technical Documents
 No messages |  New Posts |  Watched Topics |  Register  
Motor breaks 2 Typhoons then boots it out of PCOTY

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Motoring and Motorsport Forum
 
Kit
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:39
Posts: 2420
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Perth WA, Australia

View User Gallery (13)

 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:27 am    Post subject: Motor breaks 2 Typhoons then boots it out of PCOTY Reply with quote

Motor magazine has broken the clutches of 2 F6 Typhoons whilst in the pits after rigorous acceleration tests.
The first one happened on day one in the pits. Later that day FPV rushed a replacement Typhoon to PCOTY. The following morning it too had a clutch failure after Ford V8 Supercar driver Warren Luff, and Motor's Michael Taylor had run a total of eight laps around Winton racetrack.
Both clutch failures happened while in the pits, apparently due to the inability to select gears.
David Flint in a message stated that, "People don't drive like that!" in reference to the people at Motor's PCOTY flat shifting in the F6 Typhoon.
Motor categorically denied flat shifting in any car saying that they test using a variety of techniques to get the best possible times out of cars, but flat shifting isn't one of them. There's a big difference between driving hard and mechanical abuse and it's a line MOTOR is loathe to cross.
This brings to 3, the number of clutch failures the F6 has had since it's release, the other at the hands of Glenn Butler, doing a story for Wheels magazine.

Curiously, the clutch problem isn't the only problem the Typhoon seems to have. When it comes to power and speed, it has become evident that it is actually slower than it's sibling the XR6 Turbo.
According to dyno testing the odd Typhoon is also producing the same if not less power than the XR6 Turbo.
It appears the early XR6 Turbo out performs Ford's original specifications.

The following are results of testing thus far.

0-100km/h XR6 Turbo 5.91 F6 Typhoon 6.40
400m XR6 Turbo 14.14 F6 Typhoon 14.64
400m speed XR6 Turbo 162.6km/h F6 Typhoon 159km/h
1km XR6 Turbo 25.90 F6 Typhoon 26.24
Winton XR6 Turbo 1:46.28 F6 Typhoon 1:46.46
RwKw XR6 Turbo 185KW F6 Typhoon 200KW

According to Motor magazine, FPV have gone into emergency engineering
with the soon to be released Typhoon.
Back to top
Thomas
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:21
Posts: 1680
Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Location: Greenacre NSW, Australia

View User Gallery (5)

 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heard about this test some time ago now.

About those perfomance figures give it some time the typhoon has been tested practically twice by motor and wheels magazine, usually faster times are extracted by heaps of practise. When the GT came out it was doing 6.3 for the 100 dash and now it is doing it in the 5's.
You also might want to look up the overtaking speed 90-130 in 1st 2nd 3rd. The typhoon demolishes the GT and the club sport R8 not to mention the GTS icon_smile.gif

Might have a look around for those times for you.
Back to top
smoke_
Cruise Moderator



Age:24
Posts: 5834
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Brisbane QLD, Australia

View User Gallery (7)

 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah they're having dramas with the twin plate clutches in the f6's for some reason.
Ford will probably deny it too.
Back to top
concorde
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:29
Posts: 727
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: canberra ACT, Australia

View User Gallery (2)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

from what i've heard, the failure is in the retainer circlip's that hold the centre clutch plate in position. hard or flat shifting is just sheering them in half. 20c parts instead of $2 parts can make a huge difference.
Back to top
Au Te50
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:35
Posts: 1781
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Huntingdale, Perth WA, Australia

View User Gallery (6)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wasn't there a thread a while back about I think XR8 or XR6 having the same problem due to flat shifting.? I can't exactly remember icon_confused.gif
Back to top
smoke_
Cruise Moderator



Age:24
Posts: 5834
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Brisbane QLD, Australia

View User Gallery (7)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the xr6's are the ones having the problem, i think the v8's are fine.
and considering ford isn't making the clutches, they specifically chose one to suit the car, and they're still s**t.
It's either ford is being tight-a***, or just crap parts used in the clutch itself.
And i do believe that the editors of magazines thrash the living s**t out of those cars, no matter what they say.
Back to top
data_mine
Technical Contributor



Age:27
Posts: 5001
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Location: Canberra ACT, Australia

View User Gallery (0)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I were given an GT or F6 for a day/week. I'd thrash it too.
Back to top
smoke_
Cruise Moderator



Age:24
Posts: 5834
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Brisbane QLD, Australia

View User Gallery (7)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well thrash and drive are 2 different things, i would drive it, certainly give it some, but i wouldn't thrash it as if i stole it, no point to it, except the fact you know it's not yours.
Back to top
Disco Frank
Fordmods Junkie



Age:29
Posts: 13767
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Perth WA, Australia

View User Gallery (7)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Snow_white wrote:

You also might want to look up the overtaking speed 90-130 in 1st 2nd 3rd. The typhoon demolishes the GT and the club sport R8 not to mention the GTS icon_smile.gif

Might have a look around for those times for you.
BUT who looks at those times when buyign a car ???
the impression is made on the 0-100kmhr and the 400m time
not teh 1-2-3 ooveertakign time


yes i would bloody well drive the tits of the car if i was giving it for a week
hell if it was a commy i would do my best effort to kill the f**k
Back to top
data_mine
Technical Contributor



Age:27
Posts: 5001
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Location: Canberra ACT, Australia

View User Gallery (0)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Disco Frank wrote:

hell if it was a commy i would do my best effort to kill the f**k


amen
Back to top
Righty
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:22
Posts: 671
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne VIC, Australia

View User Gallery (0)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

smoke_rubber wrote:
And i do believe that the editors of magazines thrash the living s**t out of those cars, no matter what they say.

So? They should be. There's no point buying what really is a family car if it's not going to be overused! if u want a car that needs alot fo care and u onyl use for joy rides, go get a lambo or something. The F6's, GT's etc. NEED to be able to last because they are still family cars and im sure a very large percange of owners aer using these cars as every day drivers and intend to hold onto them for a long time.
Back to top
smoke_
Cruise Moderator



Age:24
Posts: 5834
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Brisbane QLD, Australia

View User Gallery (7)

 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Righty wrote:
There's no point buying what really is a family car if it's not going to be overused! if u want a car that needs alot fo care and u onyl use for joy rides, go get a lambo or something. The F6's, GT's etc. NEED to be able to last because they are still family cars and im sure a very large percange of owners aer using these cars as every day drivers and intend to hold onto them for a long time.

Yeah but most families or purchasers of those cars don't thrash the s**t out of them like magazine editors do, because they pay $60k+ for them and drive them, service them, wash them, basically keep it maintained.
If i paid $60k for a car, i sure as hell wouldn't flat shift in it, and dump the clutch at rev-limiter!!
Back to top
xr8 dismantler
Commercial Sponsor



Age:37
Posts: 3143
Joined: 06 Nov 2004
Location: MELBOURNE VIC, Australia

View User Gallery (0)

 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

smoke_rubber wrote:
Righty wrote:
There's no point buying what really is a family car if it's not going to be overused! if u want a car that needs alot fo care and u onyl use for joy rides, go get a lambo or something. The F6's, GT's etc. NEED to be able to last because they are still family cars and im sure a very large percange of owners aer using these cars as every day drivers and intend to hold onto them for a long time.

Yeah but most families or purchasers of those cars don't thrash the s**t out of them like magazine editors do, because they pay $60k+ for them and drive them, service them, wash them, basically keep it maintained.
If i paid $60k for a car, i sure as hell wouldn't flat shift in it, and dump the clutch at rev-limiter!!

why not icon_biggrin.gif
Back to top
twr7cx
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:22
Posts: 10462
Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Location: Hobart TAS, Australia

View User Gallery (0)

 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

smoke_rubber wrote:
Yeah but most families or purchasers of those cars don't thrash the s**t out of them like magazine editors do, because they pay $60k+ for them and drive them, service them, wash them, basically keep it maintained.
If i paid $60k for a car, i sure as hell wouldn't flat shift in it, and dump the clutch at rev-limiter!!


Sorry, I disagree. If I bought a sports/performance car I'd use it!
Back to top
data_mine
Technical Contributor



Age:27
Posts: 5001
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Location: Canberra ACT, Australia

View User Gallery (0)

 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

twr7cx wrote:
smoke_rubber wrote:
Yeah but most families or purchasers of those cars don't thrash the s**t out of them like magazine editors do, because they pay $60k+ for them and drive them, service them, wash them, basically keep it maintained.
If i paid $60k for a car, i sure as hell wouldn't flat shift in it, and dump the clutch at rev-limiter!!


Sorry, I disagree. If I bought a sports/performance car I'd use it!


I agree with that to a point. I'd most certainly drive it hard, but not thrash MY car.
Back to top
blackjack_original
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:23
Posts: 3473
Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Location: Adelaide SA, Australia

View User Gallery (8)

 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with twr on this one. If i paid some 60 odd thousand for a "performance" car i'd push it to breaking point day in day out. I didn't buy the car to wank around and drive realy slow so other kids see how cool i am, because if i'd wanted to do that i woulda bought a lancer and put an evo kit and stickers on it. I bought it just exactly so i could flat shift it, dump the clutch at the limiter, throw it sideways around corners and so on and so forth. That's the reason you buy a performance car in the first place, so you could do things with it that you cant with a family sedan (mind you that never stopped me before, hehehe) but you get my point.
Back to top
twr7cx
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:22
Posts: 10462
Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Location: Hobart TAS, Australia

View User Gallery (0)

 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

data_mine wrote:
twr7cx wrote:
smoke_rubber wrote:
Yeah but most families or purchasers of those cars don't thrash the s**t out of them like magazine editors do, because they pay $60k+ for them and drive them, service them, wash them, basically keep it maintained.
If i paid $60k for a car, i sure as hell wouldn't flat shift in it, and dump the clutch at rev-limiter!!


Sorry, I disagree. If I bought a sports/performance car I'd use it!


I agree with that to a point. I'd most certainly drive it hard, but not thrash MY car.


That's what I mean. I'd use it. Treat it like it's ment to be treated. The V8's and what not are ment to be opened up, they like it, if they didn't they wouldn't make such a beautiful noise. I wouldn't however go phyco and break/wreck the thing. But I wouldn't drive it like it's just a normal bottom of the line I6 falcon.
Back to top
smoke_
Cruise Moderator



Age:24
Posts: 5834
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Location: Brisbane QLD, Australia

View User Gallery (7)

 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah i certainly don't p***y-foot around in my car, i give it plenty when i feel, but there is a difference between trashing/thrashing a car and driving it hard.
Back to top
1 SLY 97EL
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:38
Posts: 1826
Joined: 06 Nov 2004
Location: Bayside, Brisbane QLD, Australia

View User Gallery (3)

 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I guess their is a limit too thrashing anything. Cause if you thrash it to that sort of point you probably going to end up in a wall or hitting a Lamp post and killing yourself and others.
Back to top
ESP
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways



Age:38
Posts: 479
Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Location: Coffs Harbour NSW, Australia

View User Gallery (0)

 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fair go to the mags,fellas.You show me how you would get a reasonable 0-100 time by sitting it on the limiter and dumping it.s**t,my old capri would sit there smoking/spinning,let alone if tried in an XR8..............as for flat shifting,well,no enthusiast would have that little mechanical sympathy and remember,as much as these guys seem to have the perfect job,they are enthusiasts first...........................ESP's 2c worth............
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Motoring and Motorsport Forum
Page 1 of 1

 
 
(c)2002-2009 Matti Jones and Brad Evans

[47 queries :: 0.07868 seconds ]