 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Punnisher_42
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:26
Posts: 744
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Location: Tingalpa QLD, Australia
View User Gallery (26)
|
 Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
well i have had an early 3.9 CFI that would always overheat etc.
my current eb is 3.9 Multipoint and i gotta say it goes pretty hard... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Froudey
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:24
Posts: 3890
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Location: Dubbo NSW, Australia
View User Gallery (10)
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 02tonna wrote: | | rack off. its a well known fact that the 3.9L was the crappest motor ford produced. i should know i had a eb 3.9L. what im sayin is if you want a better take off get a 4.0L.. note the 2 guys that cracked it both own crappy 3.9L's. maybe this is the reason there ragging because of what i said. |
really this is just getting retarded... you are talking about an engine that let's face it is 20 YEARS OLD....
if i owned a BA or AU or even a ED people wouldn't say stupid s**t... even if i owned a BA or post EA motored car i would of had the same problem from my techniquie being sloppy (prior to now)
queastion how many cc difference is there from an au block not many is there.... the 3.9 has alot of potential when money is put into.....
Mods just lock this thread it is an old topic.... and getting silly |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02tonna
Fordmods Parts Gopher
Age:22
Posts: 75
Joined: 06 Nov 2007
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (4)
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| phongus wrote: |
As you can see, he said it was a human related issue. I believe the 3.9L was the better engine out of the 3.2L and 4.1L from the previous models. Not to mention the 4.0L was probably came about due to the 3.9L.
Anyways topic is over now since the problem had been solved.
phong =P~ |
true the 4.0 would have evolved from the 3.9 but because it was the first motor to be fuel injected (i think) it was a trial for the better motor. it was a motor to get the kinks out. sorry to drift off topic but i was just making a joke and some people got offended so they just need to liten up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02tonna
Fordmods Parts Gopher
Age:22
Posts: 75
Joined: 06 Nov 2007
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (4)
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Froudey wrote: | | 02tonna wrote: | | rack off. its a well known fact that the 3.9L was the crappest motor ford produced. i should know i had a eb 3.9L. what im sayin is if you want a better take off get a 4.0L.. note the 2 guys that cracked it both own crappy 3.9L's. maybe this is the reason there ragging because of what i said. |
really this is just getting retarded... you are talking about an engine that let's face it is 20 YEARS OLD....
if i owned a BA or AU or even a ED people wouldn't say stupid s**t... even if i owned a BA or post EA motored car i would of had the same problem from my techniquie being sloppy (prior to now)
queastion how many cc difference is there from an au block not many is there.... the 3.9 has alot of potential when money is put into.....
Mods just lock this thread it is an old topic.... and getting silly |
sorry didnt see the next page...... each to there own i like my 5.4 u like your 3.9 who cares topic over |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
phongus
Fordmods Junkie
Age:23
Posts: 8839
Joined: 17 May 2005
Location: Melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (11)
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 02tonna wrote: | | phongus wrote: |
As you can see, he said it was a human related issue. I believe the 3.9L was the better engine out of the 3.2L and 4.1L from the previous models. Not to mention the 4.0L was probably came about due to the 3.9L.
Anyways topic is over now since the problem had been solved.
phong =P~ |
true the 4.0 would have evolved from the 3.9 but because it was the first motor to be fuel injected (i think) it was a trial for the better motor. it was a motor to get the kinks out. sorry to drift off topic but i was just making a joke and some people got offended so they just need to liten up. |
We like smiley faces when it comes to jokes  . They make the comment a happy place.  
phong =P~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02tonna
Fordmods Parts Gopher
Age:22
Posts: 75
Joined: 06 Nov 2007
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (4)
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| phongus wrote: | | 02tonna wrote: | | phongus wrote: |
As you can see, he said it was a human related issue. I believe the 3.9L was the better engine out of the 3.2L and 4.1L from the previous models. Not to mention the 4.0L was probably came about due to the 3.9L.
Anyways topic is over now since the problem had been solved.
phong =P~ |
true the 4.0 would have evolved from the 3.9 but because it was the first motor to be fuel injected (i think) it was a trial for the better motor. it was a motor to get the kinks out. sorry to drift off topic but i was just making a joke and some people got offended so they just need to liten up. |
We like smiley faces when it comes to jokes . They make the comment a happy place.
phong =P~ |
cool thanks for the info.. and congrats on hitting 8000 posts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
krisisdog
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:19
Posts: 1902
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Location: Grafton NSW, Australia
View User Gallery (5)
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 02tonna wrote: |
true the 4.0 would have evolved from the 3.9 but because it was the first motor to be fuel injected (i think) it was a trial for the better motor. it was a motor to get the kinks out. sorry to drift off topic but i was just making a joke and some people got offended so they just need to liten up. |
Just fyi, the 4.1 had the option of efi from XE on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
