 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nicco
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:21
Posts: 2631
Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Location: Townsville/Cairns QLD, Australia
View User Gallery (6)
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
EDIT: ignore
Last edited by nicco on Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XH5LWEPN
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:22
Posts: 1774
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (15)
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| t2te50 wrote: |
XH5LWEPN's 236RWKW sounds like a bit of a gross exhageration. I won't dispute the time, its a ripper.
|
I dunno about a gross exhageration but thats what it made on the day and it was the same dyno it pulled 284rwhp on when it was first tuned. Sure the air temps were high so the weather correction would have been a bit out, but, what do you do? It still didnt even reach peak power as it was hitting the 180km/h speed limiter. We found peak power @ 5600rpm in 3rd gear, overlayed the graph and it may have pulled 325rwhp on that day if the speed limiter was not present.
I will have to get it back on for another run in cooler conditions so theres not as much need for the weather correction in the dyno.
Everybody quotes their dyno readouts so i will too, wether it be correct or not. As everybody knows, its not going to give a correct/right/exact reading, its only a tuning tool, but if you want to quote what it ran than everybody sould be able to. The only way to compare another car to another is to be run on the exact same dyno on the exact same day.
The 317rwhp i pulled may not be correct but i have i have no doubt that it has 300+ HP @ the tyres, i have the ET and MPH to prove it.
Here it is.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EL XR8
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:25
Posts: 2355
Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (30)
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
f**k, thats a bit of engine work, time and money for 170rwkw!
Oh well, i know if i spent thousands on a motor, i'd personally want more than a mid 14 out of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molloy
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:23
Posts: 3636
Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Location: Taree NSW, Australia
View User Gallery (23)
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EL XR8 wrote: | f**k, thats a bit of engine work, time and money for 170rwkw!
Oh well, i know if i spent thousands on a motor, i'd personally want more than a mid 14 out of it. |
Id be p****d. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
punktured
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:23
Posts: 1187
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If tractive effort is what to go by, then i think you shoulda ditched that and got a 3v  Just with cai and exhaust i was making more than that  (and that's with a f**k motor) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
green car
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:31
Posts: 479
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Location: perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have seen scaffys car and jeffs car at the drags and there is nothing wrong with the way they go, or their power outputs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GeZza200
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:20
Posts: 1009
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Location: Lilydale VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (9)
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| been reading through, 173rwkw seems to be pretty good i reckon. Just the tractive effort, are 6's and 8's rated different? mine was at 4500-4250N on my run. I would of thought it would have a heap more torque then a 6. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scaffy
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:30
Posts: 1101
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (7)
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mate, good on ya. I'm happy that you're happy with what you've got. You've started this whole lot of s**t that I don't normally buy into and looking back, I'm pretty disappointed I've let myself be dragged into it. I bite pretty easily at C**k. I can't say I've seen any other members at each other like you and so many others are.
My last dyno run I pulled 270rwhp a few weeks ago on a miserable, cold, wet day in shoot-out mode. My afrs were below 10:1 from 3500 on, so I was pretty happy with what I got under the circumstances. As for my mph, I only had between 2/3 and 3/4 throttle with my foot to the floor, so hopefully next season, I'll be seeing better.
I guess so long as we're all happy with what we've got, that's all that matters. I'm STOKED to be in the mid 13s!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
schnoods
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:24
Posts: 1846
Joined: 25 May 2006
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Scaffy wrote: | Mate, good on ya. I'm happy that you're happy with what you've got. You've started this whole lot of s**t that I don't normally buy into and looking back, I'm pretty disappointed I've let myself be dragged into it. I bite pretty easily at C**k. I can't say I've seen any other members at each other like you and so many others are.
My last dyno run I pulled 270rwhp a few weeks ago on a miserable, cold, wet day in shoot-out mode. My afrs were below 10:1 from 3500 on, so I was pretty happy with what I got under the circumstances. As for my mph, I only had between 2/3 and 3/4 throttle with my foot to the floor, so hopefully next season, I'll be seeing better.
I guess so long as we're all happy with what we've got, that's all that matters. I'm STOKED to be in the mid 13s! |
Amen to that.
We all have different goals and expectations, limitations too (same problem for me Chad) well whatever floats your boat.
Bring on Next season, looking forward to getting deeper in the 13's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fnp
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:23
Posts: 4284
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (3)
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| t2te50 wrote: | SPECS:
block bored out .030, decked .010
X303 heads decked .050
200kw cam
1.7 YELLA TERRA RR
Ported GT40 lower inlet
1 inch phenlonic spacer
BA xr8 air cleaner assembly (cyclone)
High energy oil pan 8.5L
Engine oil cooler (factory fitment and a must)
Ported MAF
HM 4-2-1 headers
Single 2 1/2 inch exhaust with rear muffler removed.
The A/F ratios have since gone from 10-11.1 to 11.5-12.5 after the build. |
All that and 10rwkw LESS then my six cylinder BA XT made?
I'd be pretty angry, not boasting on forums about it.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t2te50
Fordmods - Smokin em up
Age:27
Posts: 278
Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Location: melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Steady ED wrote: | Good result, but why do you have to make everything you do sound like it's something incredible?
Is it arrogance or do AU owners feel they have to talk themselves up because of some sort of ugly car complex? |
I never said what I did was incredible. maybe I harped on about it more then most but never made my car out to being something it wasn't.
Au's are ugly but all that is put to rest once on a race track, once you've been there only a SUPRA, PORSCHE, GTR SKYLINE, EVO 9, WRX STI or car of the like will ever tickle your fancy. TYPHOON would be nice to from the later BLUE oval products  . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t2te50
Fordmods - Smokin em up
Age:27
Posts: 278
Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Location: melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EL XR8 wrote: | f**k, thats a bit of engine work, time and money for 170rwkw!
Oh well, i know if i spent thousands on a motor, i'd personally want more than a mid 14 out of it. |
17kw increase from just a blueprint (port,heads) aint to bad. The rebuild only really cost $6,500. Before you do sink my ship I've still got one more outing to Calder Park, If I don't get flat 14 then you can toast me lol. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOTTLEDUP
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:29
Posts: 480
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Location: Perth SoR WA, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
My bog stock T1 manual made 166rwkw... So you are 10 up on an iron headed 200kW 5.0 running standard everything and a old Ryco air filter.
If you are happy with the way the car performs, and can justify your outlay then great... BUT IMHO I'd want a bit more go for the $6,500. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAST-XR
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:24
Posts: 850
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Location: liverpool NSW, Australia
View User Gallery (5)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| can throw 3k at a 4 Litre I6 for a 14.4 @ 96mph.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t2te50
Fordmods - Smokin em up
Age:27
Posts: 278
Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Location: melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BOTTLEDUP wrote: | My bog stock T1 manual made 166rwkw... So you are 10 up on an iron headed 200kW 5.0 running standard everything and a old Ryco air filter.
If you are happy with the way the car performs, and can justify your outlay then great... BUT IMHO I'd want a bit more go for the $6,500. |
A 220 let alone a blueprinted one would masacre your poor old 200kw mate. Hopefully I'll be able to prove a point on Friday. I'm personaly more then happy with the result and have a motor that can be flogged for 200,000 km, unlike most buildups here. Did I mention anything about fuel economy LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s-tranzor
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:25
Posts: 516
Joined: 29 May 2007
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^dont wanna sount like a C*** t2, but after the impression you give people and how your build progressed, I doubt you will impress anyone here unless you put up a dyno and/or put up some 1/4 times that would justify the $$$ spent on your build. So far there is nothing to paint a picture making you out to be anything except a laughing stock. 1st of all with your boasting about how good the combo would be... then locking antlers with everyone here about who knows more and whos got the faster engine, and then disputing thier proven times. Then munching your engine... and does 1st, 2nd, 3rd, Reverse *BANG* ring a bell?
Cmon man, resist the urge to dig the hole deeper and deliver something!
edit: for the record, i envy your 12.5l/100km economy. Id kill for that right now hehe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Froudey
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:24
Posts: 3899
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Location: Dubbo NSW, Australia
View User Gallery (10)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Reading this thread i think to myself really can you handle that whooping 170 what kilowatt.. if you can't handle it on the track dont know ya car limits etc a v8 AU forte vs a T seires if the forte driver knew his car 100% vs a driver that is C**k and got no idea the forte driver will win no queastions... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOTTLEDUP
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:29
Posts: 480
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Location: Perth SoR WA, Australia
View User Gallery (0)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| t2te50 wrote: | | A 220 let alone a blueprinted one would masacre your poor old 200kw mate. Hopefully I'll be able to prove a point on Friday. I'm personaly more then happy with the result and have a motor that can be flogged for 200,000 km, unlike most buildups here. Did I mention anything about fuel economy LOL |
You won't "massacre" a 200kW with your "blueprinted" 220... Perhaps I should "blueprint" my engine and prove a point to you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scaffy
Fordmods - Getting Side Ways
Age:30
Posts: 1101
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Location: Perth WA, Australia
View User Gallery (7)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| On the fuel economy, I'd like to point out that I just filled my tank with 59L of fuel. I reset the trip meter every time I fill up and had done 528km on that tank. If you do your sums correctly, that equates to 11.17L/100km. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steady ED
Fordmods Addict
Age:22
Posts: 7064
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne VIC, Australia
View User Gallery (13)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scaffy, there is no place in t2te50s thread for logic  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| (c)2002-2008 Matti Jones and Brad Evans |
[47 queries :: 0.07073 seconds ]
|
|
