|
| scottyp |
|
|||
|
what do you guys think of the lower front higher rear as i was thinking of lowering the front and not the rear to get this look are there any problems with this
i spose if i dont like it i can always lower the rear as well
_________________ "He who falls to sleep with itchy bum
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| scottyp |
|
|||
|
before you ask it an xf
_________________ "He who falls to sleep with itchy bum
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Happy |
|
|||
|
it really depends dude on if you like it or not!!!
_________________ Owning 1 of 67612 EF GLi Sedans made
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| EF 4.9 |
|
||
|
Just go and buy some air shocks, that way you can pump them up when you want to
_________________ They say people don't believe in heroes anymore. Well damn them! You and me, Max, we're gonna give them back their heroes! |
||
| Top | |
||
| scottyp |
|
|||
|
doing it is usually the best way to find out if i like it i suppose
_________________ "He who falls to sleep with itchy bum
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| chunkz |
|
|||
|
just get a bunch of mates to lift rear... or push on bonnet and see what you think ??
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| data_mine |
|
|||
|
Be careful, when I had me EL lowered (superlows all round) the front is lowe than the rear.
http://fordmods.datamine.tk/misc/IMG_1441.JPG http://fordmods.datamine.tk/misc/IMG_1442.JPG
_________________ 1998 DL LTD in Sparkling Burgundy, daily, 302W, stereo, slow |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Interceptor |
|
||
|
personally i reckon it'd look like a half done job.....
_________________ Banned |
||
| Top | |
||
| Spork |
|
|||
|
- And your handling would be up s**t creek
_________________ Manual EL Gli.
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Bassfreak55 |
|
||
|
Spork wrote: - And your handling would be up s**t creek
Spot on! When i had my XF a while ago, i had the front lowered 3 inches and left the back stock as a rock! The front had about 7cm ground clearance! At the time i liked it.. for some odd reason?! ..mates laughed at it! My handing was also s**t! Get 'em both lowered.. Looks much better. *loves the look of dropped xfs* |
||
| Top | |
||
| scottyp |
|
|||
|
yeah i think yous are right even if i just lower the front to lows to level out the car as the front seems to sit a little higher than the rear
_________________ "He who falls to sleep with itchy bum
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| ghiaman |
|
|||
|
The look from the 70's & early 80's. Have had that look in the past on a couple of cars. It looks Ok if the rear tyres are wider with higher profile tyres than the front. Will look cool on the X series cars but bizzar on the E's & later fords.
ghiaman |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Macca |
|
|||
|
It ends up looking like this, even though it doesn't look like it, that car handled good (surprised me too), it used X series cut V8 springs, pedders short sports frt shocks, whiteline 24mm front swaybar, heavy duty 4wd rear gas shocks and original rear springs, I towed a lot of things I shouldn't have, especially with that tow bar, so that is why I never got around to lowering the back.
_________________ 93 Ford Maverick LWB automatic petrol guzzler (gets stuck where Deli doesn't, big pumpkins |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| drazull |
|
||
|
@ Damage- Scotty P doesnt want to find out that when lowering his xf he may also find himself married with a dog and two kids.
_________________ Not lost any demerit points |
||
| Top | |
||
| Macca |
|
|||
|
drazull wrote: @ Damage- Scotty P doesnt want to find out that when lowering his xf he may also find himself married with a dog and two kids.
 That's a good one!
Only the dog was mine 
_________________ 93 Ford Maverick LWB automatic petrol guzzler (gets stuck where Deli doesn't, big pumpkins |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests |
)
