|
| 4dlvr |
|
|
|
http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/Artic ... 59953&vf=2
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT 2.5 exhaust, k'n'n, shiftkit, |
|
| Top | |
|
| ashcook |
|
||
|
ford are already more fuel efficient aren't they?
_________________ 351 XF ute - commercial-sponsors-forum-f53/ash-s-351-xf-ute-t75186.html |
||
| Top | |
||
| fiftyone |
|
||
Age: 22 Posts: 3326 Joined: 22nd May 2006 Ride: EL 98 Falcon Futura Saphire Location: Spazpool |
ford have produced more pwr while mantaining a reasonable economy for years now.
_________________ EL Futura Saphire. Hybrid Motor, EL GT wheels, rezapped interior lights, painted calipers, MOMO leather wheel. Chrome interor handles illuminated. Halogen lights, slotted discs, 2 1/2" sports Zorst, hiflow filter, CAI, iridiums, slim plates, xtractors, Tints, sound & Lower |
||
| Top | |
||
| fordfreak ef |
|
||
|
hope not!...
_________________ *Why so serious??
|
||
| Top | |
||
| twr7cx |
|
||
Age: 23 Posts: 11012 Joined: 15th Nov 2004 Ride: EF Falcon XR6 Supercharged wag Location: Hobart |
An engine that is running more efficient should produce both more power and have better fuel economy.
|
||
| Top | |
||
| Waggin |
|
||
|
Why would cylinder deactivation have any effect on max power ratings @ WOT?
_________________ 4 Wheels: AUII 5.0L V8 LTD - 170RWKW. Rolling on 20's and stopped by brembo. [Waggin's LTD Build] |
||
| Top | |
||
| fiftyone |
|
||
Age: 22 Posts: 3326 Joined: 22nd May 2006 Ride: EL 98 Falcon Futura Saphire Location: Spazpool |
parts inertia? hmm, maybe a compamise was needed in timing or something
_________________ EL Futura Saphire. Hybrid Motor, EL GT wheels, rezapped interior lights, painted calipers, MOMO leather wheel. Chrome interor handles illuminated. Halogen lights, slotted discs, 2 1/2" sports Zorst, hiflow filter, CAI, iridiums, slim plates, xtractors, Tints, sound & Lower |
||
| Top | |
||
| 4dlvr |
|
|
|
Waggin wrote: Why would cylinder deactivation have any effect on max power ratings @ WOT?
well for one, a different cam would be required for some reason i can see this move as a good move in the eyes of consumers, but at the same time, if it were ford that done it, i could swear it will be there down fall.. holden and toyota could sell s**t, and people would buy it these days
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT 2.5 exhaust, k'n'n, shiftkit, |
|
| Top | |
|
| ashcook |
|
||
|
thats it hey, take a turd and whack a holden logo on it and all the sheep will be wearing it as ear rings
_________________ 351 XF ute - commercial-sponsors-forum-f53/ash-s-351-xf-ute-t75186.html |
||
| Top | |
||
| gogetta |
|
||
|
marketing B.S.
_________________
|
||
| Top | |
||
| Grimketel |
|
||
|
Quote: As part of the mild engine update, all entry-level Commodore V6s built from November will get 5kW less power, representing a 2.8 per cent reduction. The 175kW power output of the new Commodore for 2009 is identical to that of the 2004 Commodore - and 20kW less than the rival Falcon.
The entry-level Commodore will now consume an average 10.6 litres of fuel every 100 kilometres, down from 10.9L/100km with the outgoing model. still not as good as the i6 doing low 10's. f**k lol at anyone who buys a new commodore. they are just market bunnies.
_________________
|
||
| Top | |
||
| Disco Frank |
|
||
|
why make a hi po v8 more fuel efficient
4dlvr wrote: Waggin wrote: Why would cylinder deactivation have any effect on max power ratings @ WOT? well for one, a different cam would be required why would a new cam be needed? from what i have read holden actually removed this from the ecus a few yrs ago to help improve peak power i do hope ford bring the cylinder deactivation to the fg mk2 ( i6 and v8 )be a awesome selling point
_________________
|
||
| Top | |
||
| twr7cx |
|
||
Age: 23 Posts: 11012 Joined: 15th Nov 2004 Ride: EF Falcon XR6 Supercharged wag Location: Hobart |
Disco Frank wrote: i do hope ford bring the cylinder deactivation to the fg mk2 ( i6 and v8 )be a awesome selling point
I reckon they need to put it in there. It's becoming more and more common, and Ford will look like they're behind the game if they don't get it going... |
||
| Top | |
||
| Molloy |
|
||
|
Watch all the new holden ads talking this s**t up once it comes out.
_________________ SS Inductions CAI, K&N Filters, M-spec FMC, Turbosmart BOV, 8psi capa tune, X-force cat. |
||
| Top | |
||
| sikford |
|
||
|
Grimketel wrote: Quote: As part of the mild engine update, all entry-level Commodore V6s built from November will get 5kW less power, representing a 2.8 per cent reduction. The 175kW power output of the new Commodore for 2009 is identical to that of the 2004 Commodore - and 20kW less than the rival Falcon. The entry-level Commodore will now consume an average 10.6 litres of fuel every 100 kilometres, down from 10.9L/100km with the outgoing model. still not as good as the i6 doing low 10's. f**k lol at anyone who buys a new commodore. they are just market bunnies. it wouldn't matter if our cars were doing the same as a commodore equivalent the fact is we're doing it with a bigger motor and more power which is what you want...
_________________ THE Fairmont Ghia : 75th Anniversary LE |
||
| Top | |
||
| Rick's EF Fairmont Wagon |
|
|
|
I dont think an I6 would run nice on half cylinders. They run beautifully on 6 as they are naturally balanced.
_________________ EF classic Wagon dual fuel 364000klm |
|
| Top | |
|
| Disco Frank |
|
||
|
Rick's EF Fairmont Wagon wrote: I dont think an I6 would run nice on half cylinders. They run beautifully on 6 as they are naturally balanced.
V6 is crap as they are not balanced and require balance shafts. they are not running on half cylinders they cylinders are shut down in a specific sequence over time i think u will find it be like 2 cylinders will not fire at a time... the siully thing is ford has the tech to do it they do it in the AU falcons if it overheats
_________________
|
||
| Top | |
||
| Falcon96kickass |
|
||
|
1.5litre 4 cylinder Holden Commodore FTW
_________________ The Team |
||
| Top | |
||
| 4dlvr |
|
|
|
Disco Frank wrote: 4dlvr wrote: Waggin wrote: Why would cylinder deactivation have any effect on max power ratings @ WOT? well for one, a different cam would be required why would a new cam be needed? F*#k if i new but it says in the article " Quote: Mr Tamburrini says different camshafts and exhaust tuning were required to accommodate the cylinder deactivation system, resulting in the reduced power and torque figures.
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT 2.5 exhaust, k'n'n, shiftkit, |
|
| Top | |
|
| 4dlvr |
|
|
|
Disco Frank wrote: Rick's EF Fairmont Wagon wrote: I dont think an I6 would run nice on half cylinders. They run beautifully on 6 as they are naturally balanced. V6 is crap as they are not balanced and require balance shafts. they are not running on half cylinders they cylinders are shut down in a specific sequence over time i think u will find it be like 2 cylinders will not fire at a time... the siully thing is ford has the tech to do it they do it in the AU falcons if it overheats thats very true, i dont think it will be hard at all since theyv used similar technology in au, and even fg launch control is used by deactivating 3 cylinders "i think" to generate boost
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT 2.5 exhaust, k'n'n, shiftkit, |
|
| Top | |
|
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
)
