|
| xhxrsix |
|
|||
|
GeZza200 wrote: so a 140odd rwkw e series would be about the same as a 175-180rwkw BA in terms of quartermile times?
i don't rekon... my ute (heavier than sedan) had around 170rwkw and ran 14.0 @97mph 1.99 60' an eseries with 140rwkw won't run 14.0.... i'd say the ba would have a little more torque aswell? Stock xr6t have around 190rwkw and run high 13's/low 14's... i doubt Smileys BA has 178rwkw unless he had major wheelspin when doing a 15.1 (no offence mate)
_________________ EF V8T 11.54 @118mph |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| fnp |
|
|||
Age: 38 Posts: 4401 Joined: 25th Mar 2005 Ride: BA XT, BA XR6T, ED Ghia 5.0 Location: Perth |
Mine made 185rwkw and ran a 14.6. 0 - 100 run:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~fnp/pics/car/MVI_0148.AVI
_________________ What's the difference between a Holden and a sheep? It's less embarrasing getting out of the back of a sheep.. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Damo |
|
|||
|
dyno figures are s**t! ET and MPH FTW!
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| fordman351 |
|
|||
|
fnp wrote: Mine made 185rwkw and ran a 14.6. 0 - 100 run:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~fnp/pics/car/MVI_0148.AVI Is this for your XT? What modifications did you implement to get that figure? That's quite impressive, i wouldn't mind doing that for my car seing as i could only achieve 119rwkw on the SOHC engine 
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests |
