Fordmods Logo

Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW? 

 

Page 12 of 13 [ 181 posts ] Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:38 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 28

Posts: 2515

Joined: 27th Mar 2006

Gallery: 1 images

Ride: FG MkII Xr6t Ute

Location: Brisbane
QLD, Australia

Waggin wrote:
Bags not being the one to prove that he doesnt touch himself.


It's okay, you only have to prove that he DOES :wink:

I think it is about high time this thread was locked.

 

_________________

EVL098 wrote:
Cramping in the hand from having it on your Wang for an excessive period of time is a definate con.
Seriously do people google "f**k up modifications for Fords owned by Jews" and get linked straight to this site nowadays?

AU,factory fitted tickford kit/IRS, t5,Sports ryder/KYB: gone.

Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:10 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 35

Posts: 9453

Joined: 9th Nov 2004

Gallery: 4 images

Ride: Fordrunner 5.0 Turbo

Location: Wollongong
NSW, Australia

I'll gladly take you up on your offer of an a*** raping at under 5000rpm. I know just the place, if you can get there.
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:15 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

I know a place, it's called forestry road, it will be a 18km race, and i'll even bring a diesel that only revs to 4000rpm

 

_________________

PERMANENTLY BANNED

Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:41 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 35

Posts: 9453

Joined: 9th Nov 2004

Gallery: 4 images

Ride: Fordrunner 5.0 Turbo

Location: Wollongong
NSW, Australia

I was thinking Prado hill but I like your style. His car would be pretty much destroyed after being lead on an 18km goose chase off road.
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:31 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 686

Joined: 26th Jul 2009

Ride: EF daily, xc project

Location: Park Central
NSW, Australia

f**k my life, what has this world come to,


bloody tosser,


cabbi take him through ousley, thats always a good place lols

 

_________________

ef falcon daily driver
78 xc falcon 500 project
http://www.fordmods.com/the-garage-f53/bradley4567-s-xc-t83750.html

calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist'

Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:41 am 
Fordmods Addict
Offline
User avatar

Age: 31

Posts: 7958

Joined: 1st Jun 2005

Gallery: 13 images

Ride: Falcon

Power: 237 rwkw

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

67RCE wrote:
Steady ED wrote:
you forgot to mention your brothers ute has a rotrex blower.
you are on crack thinking 7500rpm is a good idea just because it makes good power at 6400.


It will be built to take that, only only go that far IF it makes power there.

good luck with that, i'd just be stepping the blower drive up and not revving it that high but whatever.

 

_________________

ED XR8 Sprint - S-Trim, V500, 249rwkw
BF MKII F6 Tornado - 237rwkw

Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:44 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 43

Posts: 3787

Joined: 22nd Apr 2007

Gallery: 5 images

Ride: DENTED UP OLD AUT WAGON

Location: Wellington
New Zealand

He's not a tosser. Nor a d***head. Nor is he full of s**t. Not only isn't he American (I sense a defamation suit coming on) but he is truly worth while listening to.

My mates EA does 9,000 RPM on the way to the shops driven by his wife in first gear every morning.

And it puts out 300kw at the rear right wheel, but only 10kw on the left.
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:50 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 32

Posts: 1043

Joined: 4th Aug 2010

Ride: NA Fairlane, DC LTD

Location: Alice Springs
NT, Australia

Actually, reading the title of this, if you only produce 160rwkW @ 7500 rpm, I think there's somthing not right, A ford 4.0 I6 with some mods should do that at around 48-5200 anyway.

The best comment here (and I couldn't be bothered finding it to quote) was

you don't need revs to produce power.

Someone went spastic and took it literally, but a more defined version could be this.

You don't need HIGH REVS to produce the most power.

Look at one of those black top 4cyl motors, (hiroshima screamer is the nickname I believe) they rev to redonkulous levels...but can be still matched flywheel power wise by a motor that dosnt have to rev as much.

There's no substitute for cubic inches....

 

_________________

[color=#004080]Cheers, Jacob.

NA Fairlane Build thread:
the-garage-f53/my-fairlane-build-lowlane-t94891.html.
Also in the garage....
AU LTD, DC LTD, and Lowlane.

Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:52 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 29

Posts: 1798

Joined: 14th Jun 2006

Gallery: 7 images

Ride: FG 50th Anni G6E Turbo

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

Lowlane7 wrote:
There's no substitute for cubic inches....


Tell the HSV fanboys that as they are getting beaten by I6 Turbo's.
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:55 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 32

Posts: 1043

Joined: 4th Aug 2010

Ride: NA Fairlane, DC LTD

Location: Alice Springs
NT, Australia

Yeah, it only really applies untill forced induction is mentioned.....but N/A wise...it's correct I reckon.

 

_________________

[color=#004080]Cheers, Jacob.

NA Fairlane Build thread:
the-garage-f53/my-fairlane-build-lowlane-t94891.html.
Also in the garage....
AU LTD, DC LTD, and Lowlane.

Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:55 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 29

Posts: 1798

Joined: 14th Jun 2006

Gallery: 7 images

Ride: FG 50th Anni G6E Turbo

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

Lowlane7 wrote:
Yeah, it only really applies untill forced induction is mentioned.....but N/A wise...it's correct I reckon.


Yup. Agreed :)
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:04 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 35

Posts: 9453

Joined: 9th Nov 2004

Gallery: 4 images

Ride: Fordrunner 5.0 Turbo

Location: Wollongong
NSW, Australia

Watch this from 2:10 - 4:15 and then go and sue this guy for defamation ashbrisau.
Describes you quite well I think.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9mytOPD ... tube_gdata
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:59 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

I miss the tosser already, It had been a while since the last streetcommodores forum member ame on here and made a d**k of him self.

 

_________________

PERMANENTLY BANNED

Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 2:00 pm 
Fordmods Newbie
Offline

Age: 52

Posts: 16

Joined: 7th May 2015

Ride: EL XR6 manual 165rwkw 3.7diff

Location: adelaide
SA, Australia

Hi everyone

Getting back to engine talk I'm going to fully balance and use BA rods and Pistons in my EL motor to get the slightly better rod/stroke ratio and choice of forged pistons

I think the EF full counter weight crank is the best for revs, but will compromise with the EL lighter, less counter weighted crank.

Smaller main journals less circumference, less bearing speed, friction. I think the Au has bigger journals and rigid bottom end to contain a lighter less counter weighted crank to keep harmonics in check,

What do you think
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Question Time about REV RANGE's. 7500RPM and 160 RWKW?
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:13 pm 
Technical Contributor
Offline

Age: 59

Posts: 6817

Joined: 22nd Jun 2005

Gallery: 8 images

Ride: EF Fairmont

Location: Campbelltown
NSW, Australia

pekkerwood wrote:
Hi everyone

Getting back to engine talk I'm going to fully balance and use BA rods and Pistons in my EL motor to get the slightly better rod/stroke ratio and choice of forged pistons

I think the EF full counter weight crank is the best for revs, but will compromise with the EL lighter, less counter weighted crank.

Smaller main journals less circumference, less bearing speed, friction. I think the Au has bigger journals and rigid bottom end to contain a lighter less counter weighted crank to keep harmonics in check,

What do you think


Stroke on the BA Rod/Piston combination is exactly the same as the E Series Rod/Piston combination and as the AU Rod/Piston combination. Bore 92.26 and stroke 99.31.

Compression is Barra, 10.3:1, AU, 9.65:1 and stock EF/EL 9.3:1 (XR was 9.35:1) Better compression due to the head.

Better spinning crank is the AU, better balanced, larger journals.

Better combination would be, AU Bottom end with F6 Rods and BA/BF NA Pistons. Good solid motor.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:
Sort by  
 Page 12 of 13  [ 181 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

 

 

It is currently Tue May 30, 2017 9:50 am All times are UTC + 11 hours

 

 

(c)2014 Total Web Solutions Australia - Australian Web Hosting and Domain Names