yes, looks EXACTLY like yours haha.

to those that have payed, ill be picking up the intakes on saturday, and hopefully have them in the post early in the week.

and for the people who want to pick up, PM me and we can organise a time...

one by one these are being sold off on ebay, if your keen there are still a few left...

Dont sell mine! My payment was sent on Friday

its a simple equation, the same as for the exhaust side, size the pipe for the power. thiner pipes provide better low rpm efficiency. fatter pipes provide better high rpm efficiency. in the middle sized pipes give the best midrange efficiency. its all about velocity and this changes throughout the rpm range. a small pipe at low rpm will provide good velocity, ie higher airspeed, as it draws a certain volume through the length of the pipe giving the vaccum more time to accelerate the air. but the drawback is once a certain rpm is reached the size of the pipe cannot cope with the quantaties of air being asked of it.

on the flipside a larger bore pipe, ie 3 inch, will see lower airspeed at lower rpm. you may see that it flows smoother without corrugated elbows, giving better throttle response, but negligable actual low rpm power increase. it is when demand is high, as in mid to high rpm that the 3 inch will shine a little, as the velocity of air matches the diameter of the pipe, making the best cylinder fill for that intake size.

a no pipe system always makes more power/less torque because power is a factor of torque times revs, and no tb is at its best at the top of the rpm range, due to no restriction. it will produce lower torque down low because there is no piping with conductive vaccum properties accelerating the air at low demand levels.

this may or not make sense as i have been drinking.

lol so basically what you're saying is that a 3inch pipe will shine through when the revs get high and the demand for air is greater but by using a 3inch you will be sacraficing low end torque and power?

strange that they've not made a switch pipe that does both.. same way they did the BBM switch..

was the EF dual runner an attempt at this?

sorry bit this is a for sale thread not a place for your opinions. but... the internal diameter of the 3" pipe is only a few mm bigger than the throttle body, and whatever loss of spead at low RPM is re-gained by the lack off turbulalnce in the mandrel bent pipe.

kstevo, i have recieved your payment and ill be posting it in the next couple of days...

intakes will be posted tomorrow...

i still have a few to get rid of. PM me

pics of the finished product?

yeah ill get some up on here tomorrow, i havent taken any yet...

here are a couple of photos of the finished intakes, bling bling!

 

 

Attachments:

Picture 051.jpg [ 90.42 KiB | Viewed 1211 times ]

Picture 050.jpg [ 75.06 KiB | Viewed 1215 times ]

lots of people have been asking for a car shot, so here it is...

 

 

Attachments:

Picture 054.jpg [ 67.4 KiB | Viewed 1177 times ]

so when can i expect mine??

i posted yours on wednesday, so it shouldnt be too far away. i have all the registered post details so i can track it if need be...

Recieved mine today and looks awesome. Cant wait to get the EL adapter!

Thanks mate.