Fordmods Logo

Pacemaker Comps PH4480 power gains? 

 

Page 2 of 4 [ 47 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

 
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:17 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 35

Posts: 4305

Joined: 6th Jul 2005

Ride: BA xr8 Magnet ute

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

what headers should a person get if they are looking for low rand power. e.g when you put the foot down from start?
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:55 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

{USERNAME} wrote:
what headers should a person get if they are looking for low rand power. e.g when you put the foot down from start?



i know some will disagree

but the 4480 comps are what you want
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:19 pm 
Fordmods Junkie
Offline
User avatar

Age: 46

Posts: 1000493

Joined: 6th Nov 2004

Gallery: 2 images

Ride: AUXR6 HP With Ducati SupA Bike!

Location: Perth
WA, Australia

{USERNAME} wrote:
{USERNAME} wrote:
teh comps are for TOP END POWER and torque as they are for race cars which run in the high rpm ranges more than the low rpm ranges


Nah, definately arn't. There low and midrange. Talk to Pacemaker, talk to the Pacemaker resellers, that's what they all told me!


wtf? why would u want competetion headers desgined for low to mid power?

 

_________________

RIP SCOTT

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:33 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

because they are not a competion header..

they are too small... go do a little research on headers. then make an informed judgment
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:35 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 11105

Joined: 15th Nov 2004

Ride: No Fords current

Location: Hobart
TAS, Australia

{USERNAME} wrote:
{USERNAME} wrote:
{USERNAME} wrote:
teh comps are for TOP END POWER and torque as they are for race cars which run in the high rpm ranges more than the low rpm ranges


Nah, definately arn't. There low and midrange. Talk to Pacemaker, talk to the Pacemaker resellers, that's what they all told me!


wtf? why would u want competetion headers desgined for low to mid power?


I dunno, I don't name them, I just use them!
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:26 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Posts: 916

Joined: 27th Nov 2004

Gallery: 4 images

Ride: EL Futura

Location: Berri
SA, Australia

Well i did a diagnostic and the only error thrown was 116 which is for my ECT sensor.

I did the test with a cold engine, should it of been warm first?

 

_________________

5 Speed EL Futura
Stock as a rock*
Image
A1 Oils - Synthetic lubricants: www.a1oils.com.au
* A rock that has been Alted

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:44 pm 
Stock as a Rock
Offline

Posts: 121

Joined: 4th Oct 2005

Gallery: 7 images

Ride: EL Fairmont

Location: North
SA, Australia

4499
Prim. Pipe - 1 5/8" 41mm
Sec. Pipe - 1 7/8" 48mm
Outlet (flanged) - 2 ½" 63mm

4480
Prim. Pipe - 1½" 38mm
Sec. Pipe - 1 7/8¾" 44mm
Outlet (flanged) - 2 ½" 63mm

Thats the only difference from the 2. So whats best?

Taken from the website.
www.pacemaker.com.au

 

_________________

Chooka - Ford Fairmont EL
Future Mods coming....

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:50 pm 
Stock as a Rock
Offline

Posts: 121

Joined: 4th Oct 2005

Gallery: 7 images

Ride: EL Fairmont

Location: North
SA, Australia

{DESCRIPTION}

The 4499 are above the 4480, just need to scroll up to see the details.

 

_________________

Chooka - Ford Fairmont EL
Future Mods coming....

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 5:51 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

Thats not the only difference.
pipe length is different. the 4499 are 6 into 2 into 1
the 4480 are 6 into 3 into 1.

what is the best depends on what you want out of them
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Pacemaker Comps PH4480 power gains?
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 8:58 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 43

Posts: 1534

Joined: 16th Aug 2005

Ride: 03 BA XR6

Location: Cranbourne VIC
VIC, Australia

{USERNAME} wrote:
Hi all.

I got my pacie comps fitted today. Already had a 2 1/2" cat back system. I have a high flow filter, and a mandral 3" intake, AU XR snorkle.

Should I be able to feel a power increase? I can't, and I actually think it goes worse. The car even sounds like crap and is HEAPS quieter than it used to be. :(

To be honest i'm deeply upset with the investment at the moment. I hope the ECU learns it all, and i get my power increase that i was kind of expecting, and a decent exhaust note.


you probably wont notice a whole lot of difference, unless your absolutely hammering along, the power gain from what i noticed wasnt anything spectacular with a better air intake, and paceys/2.5" but it should be more responsive than it was before.. (ie time it takes the car to move faster, from when you plant your foot should be shorter) it will also take the ecu a week or two to adjust to the changes, depending how much you drive..

as far as the sound goes, when they are first fitted, they sound disapointing quiet and crap... the car will sound completely different in about 2 weeks-a month, the sound is dependant on normal exhaust buildups like carbon in the exhaust system, once its run in - it will sound alot better.

back to the power increases, as i said they wont be anything special...the idea behind a better intake, and exhaust isnt to make the car go faster or harder, its to have better continual flow and less restrictions, to work in conjuction with other mods like cam, headwork etc etc, you might notice perhaps a 5-10% difference after the intake and exhaust are done, but when other mods are performed to your car ie a cam, it will magnify that 10% to say %15,

the basic principle i believe in making a car perform better (anyone correct me if im wrong) is creating a car with least perfomance restrictions possible.. wether its restriction due to not enough of air, fuel, pressure, combustion, spark, poor gear ratios, too much weight, too much backpressure or not enough, too much loss to the driveline, engine components too hot etc etc

by fitting your air intake, and exhaust you have eliminated some of the air flow restrictions and some of the excessive backpressure restrictions, thats only two boxes you've crossed off the list out of 100's of items you could improve on, dont be too disheartened :P

 

_________________

2003 BA Ford Falcon XR6 | BF Typhoon Intake + K&N Filter | Lukey 2.5" catback zorst | More mods coming soon....

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:07 am 
Smokin em up
Offline

Age: 48

Posts: 285

Joined: 6th Nov 2004

Location: x
NSW, Australia

I was very happy with mine. I did a before and after dyno thats in the gallery so you know they worked for me.

Should be able to tell the difference really though.
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:16 am 
Smokin em up
Offline

Age: 48

Posts: 285

Joined: 6th Nov 2004

Location: x
NSW, Australia

If you look at my dyno results despite all the talk of where they should work they actually gave good gains down low better gains up top and in the mid range not much. this on a BBM AU of course with larger exhaust valves than the E series except XR6.
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:20 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 39

Posts: 658

Joined: 5th Nov 2004

Ride: Falcon

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

I'm still not sure, but I'm with Frank on this one.

Comp headers, are more designed for top end, so unless your doing over 100km/h and in the high rpm, you wont feel all that much. So they should provide a better 1/4 mile time, as they have the mid and high range down pact (Just my opinion)

Quote:
All our headers are Interference design or T.Y. which are best suited for standard or mildly modified engines revving up to 6,500 RPM. This design gives much higher torque and horsepower figures than tuned type which work well in the mid to high rev range, e.g. 5,000 to 9,000 RPM


When you get your muffler fixed, you might feel some difference, but give it a week or two, and it might change. Remember you've already done a fair amount of mods without the extractors, so the headers might not add that much on top of what you've got.

Cheers

 

_________________

Image

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 7:47 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

{USERNAME} wrote:
I'm still not sure, but I'm with Frank on this one.

Comp headers, are more designed for top end, so unless your doing over 100km/h and in the high rpm, you wont feel all that much. So they should provide a better 1/4 mile time, as they have the mid and high range down pact (Just my opinion)

Quote:
All our headers are Interference design or T.Y. which are best suited for standard or mildly modified engines revving up to 6,500 RPM. This design gives much higher torque and horsepower figures than tuned type which work well in the mid to high rev range, e.g. 5,000 to 9,000 RPM



Cheers



comp series is only a name.
the ph4088 ARE NOT a competion header.
go have a look at the posted dyno graphs. they show power being up over the entire rev range. not just the top end.

peak power is up by 10kw. you can clearly see the change point for the BBM. right fromt he start of the graph power is up at some points by 10kw but 7kw on average.
if they were are competion header designed for top end power would be down at lower revs.

the ph4088 is an all round header with a focus on low mid power.
just as i have said befor and just as pacemaker said when the ph4088 was realised.


http://www.fordmods.com/forums/gallery. ... f=2058&m=0
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:24 pm 
Tyre Shredder
Offline

Age: 38

Posts: 391

Joined: 9th Feb 2005

Ride: EB falcon 5spd

Location: adelaide
SA, Australia

{USERNAME} wrote:
I'm still not sure, but I'm with Frank on this one.

Comp headers, are more designed for top end, so unless your doing over 100km/h and in the high rpm, you wont feel all that much. So they should provide a better 1/4 mile time, as they have the mid and high range down pact (Just my opinion)

Quote:
All our headers are Interference design or T.Y. which are best suited for standard or mildly modified engines revving up to 6,500 RPM. This design gives much higher torque and horsepower figures than tuned type which work well in the mid to high rev range, e.g. 5,000 to 9,000 RPM


When you get your muffler fixed, you might feel some difference, but give it a week or two, and it might change. Remember you've already done a fair amount of mods without the extractors, so the headers might not add that much on top of what you've got.

Cheers


me too. this isnt the only mod ive got, also stage 3 its engine and xh snorkel and k+n filter and ea tb to abox pipe. all except engine was in before headers and even then i only felt high end gain (realy only in 3rd over 100...whoo!) now with its engine.....WHOOOOOO!

 

_________________

1993 EBII GLI, IT'S PERFORMANCE Stage 3 engine,
XH Snorkel, K+N panel, Pacie 4480, High flow cat,
2.5" Lukey cat back system. Monroe GT Gas shocks + struts.

just dyno'd at 140.9RWKW

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:
Sort by  
 Page 2 of 4  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

 

 

It is currently Tue May 20, 2025 2:28 pm All times are UTC + 11 hours

 

 

(c)2014 Total Web Solutions Australia - Australian Web Hosting and Domain Names